Event Sourcing vs. Change Data Capture in Software Engineering: Key Differences and Best Practices

Last Updated Mar 16, 2025
By LR Lynd

Event sourcing captures all changes to an application state as a sequence of immutable events, enabling complete auditability and easy state reconstruction. Change Data Capture (CDC) monitors and records changes in a database, typically used for data replication and synchronization across systems. While event sourcing focuses on business logic and state management, CDC emphasizes data integration and consistency.

Table of Comparison

Feature Event Sourcing Change Data Capture (CDC)
Definition Stores a sequence of events representing state changes. Tracks and captures database changes in real-time.
Primary Use Case System state reconstruction and audit logs. Data replication, synchronization, and analytics.
Data Storage Event store or log-based storage. Database transaction logs or change tables.
Performance Impact Low read performance, optimized writes. Minimal impact on database performance.
Data Granularity Domain events with business context. Raw data changes without context.
Consistency Model Strong consistency through event ordering. Eventual consistency in downstream systems.
Implementation Complexity Higher, requires event modeling and replay logic. Lower, integrates with existing databases.
Use Case Examples Financial systems, audit trails, CQRS. Data warehousing, microservices integration.

Introduction to Event Sourcing and Change Data Capture

Event Sourcing captures all changes to an application's state as a sequence of immutable events, enabling precise state reconstruction and auditability. Change Data Capture (CDC) monitors and records database transaction logs to propagate changes in real-time to downstream systems for data consistency and integration. Both techniques ensure data integrity but differ in implementation focus: Event Sourcing leverages event logs as the source of truth, while CDC extracts changes from existing database operations.

Core Concepts: What is Event Sourcing?

Event Sourcing is a design pattern where all changes to application state are stored as a sequence of immutable events. Each event represents a specific change, enabling perfect audit trails and the ability to reconstruct past states by replaying events. Unlike Change Data Capture, which focuses on capturing changes from databases, Event Sourcing natively stores state changes within the application's domain model for consistency and traceability.

Core Concepts: What is Change Data Capture?

Change Data Capture (CDC) is a data integration technique that identifies and captures changes made to a database in real-time, enabling efficient data replication and synchronization across systems. Unlike event sourcing, which stores a sequence of immutable events representing state changes of an application, CDC focuses on tracking and extracting inserts, updates, and deletes directly from database transaction logs or tables. CDC is essential for enabling real-time analytics, data warehousing, and microservices communication by ensuring changes are consistently propagated with minimal latency.

Architectural Differences: Event Sourcing vs Change Data Capture

Event sourcing captures all changes to an application's state as a sequence of immutable events, enabling complete state reconstruction from the event log, while change data capture (CDC) tracks changes at the database level by monitoring commit logs or triggers to replicate or synchronize data across systems. Architecturally, event sourcing centralizes event storage as the primary datastore, ensuring consistency and auditability, whereas CDC operates as a supplemental process, relying on the existing database schema and infrastructure without altering the primary data store. Event sourcing requires a paradigm shift in design thinking with event replay capabilities, while CDC focuses on integrating heterogeneous systems through real-time data streaming, emphasizing data propagation over event-driven state management.

Data Consistency and Integrity Considerations

Event sourcing ensures data consistency and integrity by storing immutable event logs that represent every state change, enabling accurate state reconstruction and auditability. Change Data Capture (CDC) captures and streams database changes in real-time but may introduce latency and risk of data loss or duplication, impacting consistency. Event sourcing's append-only model inherently supports stronger consistency guarantees compared to CDC's reliance on database transaction logs and external replication mechanisms.

Scalability and Performance Implications

Event sourcing stores every state change as an immutable event, enabling robust audit trails and easy replays, which can improve scalability by offloading read models but may introduce latency due to event processing. Change Data Capture (CDC) captures database changes in real-time, offering low-latency data propagation that enhances performance for data synchronization tasks but can create bottlenecks if the change volume is high. Scalability in event sourcing benefits from event partitioning and asynchronous processing, whereas CDC scalability depends heavily on the underlying database's ability to handle large transaction logs efficiently.

Use Cases: When to Choose Event Sourcing

Event sourcing excels in complex domain-driven designs where audit trails, replayability, and state reconstruction are crucial, such as financial systems and collaborative platforms. It is ideal for applications requiring full historical context and business logic immutability, enabling debugging, analytics, and temporal queries. Change Data Capture suits scenarios focused on database replication and integration but lacks the granular domain intent and business event semantics inherent in event sourcing.

Use Cases: When to Choose Change Data Capture

Change Data Capture (CDC) is ideal for real-time data integration and replication, enabling seamless synchronization between transactional databases and data warehouses or lakes without impacting system performance. It excels in analytics pipelines, auditing, and regulatory compliance scenarios where accurate historical data tracking and minimal latency are crucial. CDC suits organizations needing efficient incremental updates and event-driven architectures without the complexity of full event sourcing implementations.

Challenges and Best Practices

Event sourcing challenges include maintaining event integrity, ensuring event schema evolution, and managing event storage scalability, while best practices involve implementing versioning strategies, leveraging idempotent event handling, and adopting efficient snapshotting techniques. Change Data Capture (CDC) faces difficulties in handling data latency, ensuring consistency across distributed systems, and dealing with noisy data from transactional logs; best practices recommend using reliable CDC tools like Debezium, implementing filtering and transformation layers, and ensuring robust monitoring and error handling. Both approaches benefit from comprehensive testing, clear event or change modeling, and aligning data strategies with system requirements for optimal performance and reliability.

Conclusion: Making the Right Choice for Your Architecture

Choosing between event sourcing and change data capture depends on your system requirements and architectural goals. Event sourcing provides a complete history of state changes, ideal for complex business logic and auditability, while change data capture efficiently tracks and propagates database changes for real-time integration and analytics. Evaluating factors like consistency needs, system complexity, and data processing latency ensures you select the approach that best aligns with your scalable and maintainable architecture.

Command Query Responsibility Segregation (CQRS)

Event sourcing captures all state changes as immutable events enabling CQRS to separate read and write models efficiently, while change data capture tracks database changes externally to synchronize read models without inherently supporting command handling in CQRS.

Event Store

Event Store uses event sourcing to record immutable event streams as the primary source of truth, providing a complete audit trail and enabling complex state reconstruction, whereas change data capture captures database changes for integration but lacks the comprehensive event context inherent in event sourcing.

Outbox Pattern

The Outbox Pattern enhances event sourcing and change data capture by ensuring reliable event publication through transactional writes to an outbox table, enabling consistent state synchronization between the database and event-driven systems.

Domain Event

Event sourcing captures all domain events as the primary source of truth for state changes, whereas change data capture tracks database-level changes without explicitly representing domain events.

Stream Processing

Event sourcing captures all changes as immutable events, enabling precise stream processing, while change data capture extracts and streams database modifications, facilitating near-real-time data integration.

Audit Trail

Event sourcing creates a comprehensive audit trail by storing all state changes as immutable events, while change data capture tracks and records database modifications to enable auditing and data replication.

Log-Based CDC

Log-based Change Data Capture (CDC) captures database changes directly from transaction logs for real-time data replication, whereas Event Sourcing records state changes as immutable events to reconstruct application state over time.

Temporal Consistency

Event sourcing ensures temporal consistency by storing all state changes as an immutable sequence of events, whereas change data capture can face temporal consistency challenges due to its reliance on capturing data modifications directly from the database logs.

Eventual Consistency

Event sourcing ensures eventual consistency by storing each state change as an immutable event log, while change data capture achieves eventual consistency through real-time replication of database changes to downstream systems.

State Reconstruction

Event sourcing reconstructs state by replaying a complete sequence of immutable events, while change data capture rebuilds state by capturing and applying database changes incrementally.

event sourcing vs change data capture Infographic

Event Sourcing vs. Change Data Capture in Software Engineering: Key Differences and Best Practices


About the author. LR Lynd is an accomplished engineering writer and blogger known for making complex technical topics accessible to a broad audience. With a background in mechanical engineering, Lynd has published numerous articles exploring innovations in technology and sustainable design.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about event sourcing vs change data capture are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet