SSG vs SSR in Software Engineering: Key Differences, Benefits, and Use Cases

Last Updated Mar 16, 2025
By LR Lynd

Static Site Generation (SSG) delivers pre-rendered HTML files at build time, resulting in faster load times and improved SEO by serving fully rendered pages to users instantly. Server-Side Rendering (SSR) generates HTML dynamically on each request, enabling real-time content updates and personalized experiences while potentially increasing server load. Choosing between SSG and SSR depends on the project's requirements for performance, scalability, and content freshness.

Table of Comparison

Feature SSG (Static Site Generation) SSR (Server-Side Rendering)
Rendering Time At build time On each request
Performance Faster page load, CDN optimized Moderate speed, server dependent
SEO Excellent, pre-rendered HTML Good, dynamic content rendered server-side
Use Case Static websites, blogs, documentation Dynamic apps, personalized content
Server Load Minimal, static files served Higher, rendering per request
Development Complexity Lower, simpler deployment Higher, requires server setup
Data Freshness Needs rebuild for updates Always up-to-date on request

Introduction to SSG and SSR

Static Site Generation (SSG) pre-renders web pages at build time, producing static HTML files that load quickly and improve SEO by serving content instantly to users. Server-Side Rendering (SSR) generates HTML dynamically on the server per request, enabling personalized and up-to-date content delivery for each user interaction. Both techniques optimize web performance and user experience by balancing speed, scalability, and real-time content needs.

Core Concepts: What is SSG?

Static Site Generation (SSG) is a web development process that pre-builds HTML pages at compile time, enabling fast loading speeds and improved SEO by serving static content directly from a CDN or server. Unlike Server-Side Rendering (SSR), which builds pages dynamically on each request, SSG creates fully rendered pages ahead of time, reducing server load and latency. Popular frameworks like Next.js and Gatsby utilize SSG to generate optimized, cacheable static pages for enhanced performance and scalability.

Core Concepts: What is SSR?

Server-Side Rendering (SSR) is a web development technique where the server generates the full HTML for a webpage on each request, delivering a fully rendered page to the client. This method improves initial load times and SEO by providing content immediately without waiting for client-side JavaScript execution. SSR is commonly used in frameworks like Next.js and Nuxt.js to enhance performance and search engine visibility.

Key Differences Between SSG and SSR

Static Site Generation (SSG) pre-renders HTML pages at build time, delivering fast loading speeds and improved SEO by serving static content without server dependencies. Server-Side Rendering (SSR) dynamically generates pages on each request, enabling real-time data fetching and personalized content but potentially increasing server response time. SSG suits content-focused sites with infrequent updates, whereas SSR is ideal for applications requiring user-specific data and frequent content changes.

Performance Comparison: SSG vs SSR

Static Site Generation (SSG) delivers faster load times by pre-rendering pages at build time, resulting in reduced server processing and improved caching capabilities. Server-Side Rendering (SSR) generates pages on each request, which can increase time-to-first-byte (TTFB) but allows dynamic content delivery and personalized user experiences. In high-traffic scenarios, SSG outperforms SSR due to lower server load and enhanced scalability, whereas SSR excels when real-time data and frequent updates are crucial.

SEO Implications of SSG and SSR

Static Site Generation (SSG) improves SEO by delivering fully rendered HTML pages to search engines, enabling faster crawl rates and better indexing with minimal server load. Server-Side Rendering (SSR) dynamically generates HTML on each request, ensuring up-to-date content visibility for search engines but may introduce slower response times impacting crawl efficiency. Both methods enhance SEO by providing crawlable content, yet SSG often results in superior page speed and reliability, key factors for higher search rankings.

Use Cases: When to Choose SSG

Static Site Generation (SSG) is ideal for websites with content that doesn't change frequently, such as blogs, documentation sites, and marketing pages, where fast load times and SEO performance are priorities. E-commerce product catalogs with stable inventory and portfolio websites benefit from SSG by delivering pre-rendered pages quickly to users. Choosing SSG also reduces server load since pages are served as static assets, making it suitable for high-traffic sites requiring scalability and minimal runtime processing.

Use Cases: When to Choose SSR

Server-Side Rendering (SSR) is ideal for dynamic web applications requiring real-time data updates, such as e-commerce platforms and news websites, where content personalization and SEO are critical. SSR enhances performance for first-page loads by generating HTML on the server, benefiting users with slower internet connections or devices. Choosing SSR enables consistent indexing by search engines, improving discoverability for time-sensitive or frequently changing content.

Popular Frameworks Supporting SSG and SSR

Next.js supports both Static Site Generation (SSG) and Server-Side Rendering (SSR), enabling developers to choose between pre-rendering pages at build time or generating them on each request. Gatsby specializes in SSG, offering fast performance by building static pages ahead of time, while Nuxt.js provides robust support for both SSR and SSG in Vue.js applications. React Static and Eleventy are popular frameworks focusing primarily on SSG, optimizing speed and SEO through static content delivery.

Conclusion: Selecting the Right Rendering Strategy

Choosing between Static Site Generation (SSG) and Server Side Rendering (SSR) depends on factors like content update frequency, SEO needs, and user experience priorities. SSG offers faster load times and better scalability for static content, while SSR excels in delivering dynamic, personalized content with real-time data. Evaluating project requirements and audience expectations ensures the optimal rendering strategy for performance and engagement.

Hydration

SSG generates static HTML at build time requiring minimal hydration for interactivity, while SSR renders HTML on each request with complete hydration to ensure dynamic content updates.

Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR)

Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR) enhances Static Site Generation (SSG) by enabling static pages to be updated incrementally at runtime without rebuilding the entire site, offering faster performance than Server-Side Rendering (SSR) while maintaining up-to-date content.

On-demand Revalidation

On-demand revalidation in SSG allows static pages to be refreshed instantly based on specific triggers, whereas SSR generates pages dynamically on each request without caching delays.

Prerendering

Static Site Generation (SSG) prerenders all pages at build time, delivering fast, cacheable HTML, while Server-Side Rendering (SSR) prerenders pages on each request, enabling dynamic, up-to-date content.

Edge Rendering

Edge Rendering combines the pre-built performance benefits of Static Site Generation (SSG) with dynamic content capabilities of Server-Side Rendering (SSR) by distributing rendering processes closer to users via edge servers, reducing latency and improving load times.

Jamstack

Jamstack leverages SSG for faster, more secure websites by pre-rendering static pages, while SSR offers dynamic content rendering on demand but with increased server load and latency.

Dynamic Routing

Dynamic routing with SSR enables real-time data fetching per request, while SSG pre-builds static pages limiting dynamic route flexibility and requiring re-generation for updates.

API-driven Content

SSG pre-renders API-driven content at build time for fast load speeds and SEO benefits, while SSR fetches API data on each request to deliver dynamic, up-to-date content.

Build Time Rendering

Static Site Generation (SSG) builds HTML at build time for faster load speeds and improved SEO, while Server-Side Rendering (SSR) generates HTML on each request, resulting in slower build times but more dynamic content.

Serverless Functions

Serverless functions enable SSR to dynamically generate fresh content per request, while SSG pre-renders static pages at build time for faster delivery and reduced server load.

SSG vs SSR Infographic

SSG vs SSR in Software Engineering: Key Differences, Benefits, and Use Cases


About the author. LR Lynd is an accomplished engineering writer and blogger known for making complex technical topics accessible to a broad audience. With a background in mechanical engineering, Lynd has published numerous articles exploring innovations in technology and sustainable design.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about SSG vs SSR are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet